Anyway, there will be the same complaints this year as in past years. I personally know multiple folks who have reached out to GenCon with these complains in hopes that there is something that can be done, but nothing ever is. I really hate it, but not enough to not play. It's just too convenient to walk to the convention center from home and play a ton of magic.
Unless the organizers violate the Host Policy there isn't much that Gencon will do. By the way, bullet point 4 IS the kind of thing that can get them in hot water.
This is beside the point. "Run your own event" is not a response to these concerns, for many reasons, such as:
1. You will not be allowed to set up computers,printers, PA systems, a stage, permanent storage space on the gaming floor, registration desks, etc., etc. as Pastimes is.
2. You will not receive free magic product from Wizards of the Coast as an incentive to run your event, as Pastimes does.
3. You will not be provided volunteers to run and staff your events and provided rare cards or other incentives to compensate them, as Pastimes is (by WoTC, not by Gen Con)
4. Your events will not be sanctioned by WotC, and players will not accumulate various player rewards, as participants in Pastimes events are.
I'm not saying you can't have fun at Gen Con because of Pastimes.
I'm not saying you can't set up a magic event you and your friends would find fun at Gen Con.
I'm saying "run your own event" is not a response to concerns of "A large (largest?) EO who runs a huge number (the most?) events at Gen Con and has some exclusive relationship with a huge gaming company routinely mismanage events year after year in a way that harm the Gen Con attendee experience."
Gen Con gives Pastimes an enormous amount of floor space, and an enormous audience, from which Pastimes generates a substantial amount of revenue (Pastimes is not a charity, they are at Gen Con to make money). Gen Con could do the players a solid by using this leverage to cause Pastimes provide a better attendee experience.
Man, I’ve never seen someone come to the defense of Past Times before.
Since WotC seems to be the one backing past times, why are you complaining to Gencon to do something. Gencon and WotC have no relationship. WotC does not even come to gencon.
If they are violating the event host policy complain to gencon, they will do something about that, otherwise direct your complaints to WotC, since WotC is the company supporting PT.
PT isn't "given" space by Gencon, they rent it like every other group. $5 a square foot. +/- 10% depending on location.
None of the game companies have exclusive rights to run games. if someone wants to run a MtG tournament they can. And while MtG is huge, there are other groups that are just a large, Pazio (pathfinder/starfinder) and Baldman (D&D) both run huge events all day long (i think baldman does some 35k-40k seats over the 4 days).
And I'm not defending PT, I'm defending Gencon and pointing out that this isn't the company to complain to if you want some change. To me it sounds like PT couldn't organize lemmings off a cliff.
Nobody’s harping on GC, guy.
I know this is a nerd convention, but good lord.
Okay, guys, chill. Don't make me use the Atomic Flamethrower on this thread.
Roderick Robertson Forum Coordinator Gen Con, LLC.
You might want to reread this paragraph. The poster is definitely suggesting that it's somehow Gen Con's job to make Pastimes do a better job, when it's not their job at all:
Part of putting on a good show is holding EOs accountable for providing a good participant experience, by doing what is within the EOs control related to running a good event (e.g. start on time, have adequate staff and resources, run the events as advertised, etc.)
I'm surprised if people don't agree with this.
If you think Gen Con does not have a responsibility to handle Gen Con customer concerns about an EO who has problems every year - you're welcome to that opinion.
I'm not saying things 1-3 are impossible.
I'm saying if you and your buddies put together a few Magic events, you will not be able to get those things.
The point I'm making is "if you don't like Pastimes, just run your own event" is not a reasonable response to "this EO routinely puts events which are misrun." The reasonable response is for Gen Con to ask the Eo to not misrun events.
My wording on #3 was poor, I meant:
B. You will not be provided free product/judge exclusive cards by WoTC as incentives for your volunteers.
I don't believe WoTC would provide free product to anyone running M:tG events other than their official EO at Gen Con - but I could be wrong. Are you aware of any examples of this happening?
And this brings me back to my point, GC is not responsible for how well/poorly an EO does beyond ensuring they follow the basic host policy. I get that the OP issue is that this EO couldn't organize lemmings off a cliff, but that still isn't a GC problem. As long as the group continues to get people supporting their behavior they will have zero incentive to change.
Pasttims is a local game store in niles, IL. Complain on their FB and website about how they run the events. Complain on FB to WotC about how they organize the events. But don't expect GC to make them change beyond following the host policy.
You have a voice and you can make a difference, just make sure you are using it to talk to the people who need to hear it.
Gen Con does have a certain amount of influence in this situation, and it could start the conversation with Pastimes about the quality of their events.
For example, they could talk to whoever is in charge of Pastimes and say, "Listen, there have been a lot of serious problems with your events over the past few years, and it's affecting the quality of the convention experience for our attendees. What can we both do to help make your events better?"
Of course, we're not going to hear about that conversation on these forums, but I'd like to think that it might be happening.
That said, stop supporting their events then. If you keep enabling this behavior it will continue. That is your only recourse now. If people stop showing up to events, they will either stop having them, allowing another EO to step up, or they will fix the issues.
the only reason i'll stop playing there is if there's another place walking distance from my home that offers endless magic events for those four days at a reasonable price. like i said, not enough issues here to not go. i'm super surprised how quickly you are to run to past time's defenses. it's not like i'm sitting over here all alone complaining. there are literal hundreds of the same complaints year-in and year-out regarding past times at gencon (not to mention other pt events). all i've done is point them out.
i'm not expecting things to be run perfectly (or even perfectly in my definition of the word). this is a huge event with a million moving pieces and must be a royal pain the ass. like i said, i'll never host my own event. way too much work. but i think it's ridiculous to ridicule someone for pointing out these flaws. why can't people complain about them? "host your own event" or "don't go" are not solutions. you can't ostrich your way out of things. if you disagree with my opinion (and other's) about how things are ran, then that's fantastic -- i'm happy there's one person who hasn't been pissed off about the way things are ran over there once in four days.
anyway, i started this thread to voice the yearly complaints that will inevitably come in. i don't recall anyone running to pt's defenses in similar discussions on here in past years, but happy to have a discussion regardless.
though that being said, what's so wrong with someone pointing out that gencon missed the boat on something on a gencon message board, if it were the case?
Sorry, maybe I'm not clear, at no point am I defending PT. I get it, I said it before, they couldn't organize lemmings off a cliff.
And there you go again,
i see your point, though to clarify, it wasn't my intention to put blame on gencon. just meant to say that, "yes, people have complained to gencon in the past regarding these issues, but no corrective measures have been made from their end, at least as i can tell." <--that would be a criticism of GC.